This online session is aimed at those who:Â
- are new to peer review Âé¶¹ÒùÔº abstracts
- would like to peer review for Âé¶¹ÒùÔº in future
- are more experienced
but would like the reassurance of a collaboration opportunity.
We will be discussing three anonymised exampleabstracts (shared beforehand) and discussing as a group the categories we award points for, the points we would award these examples and then reaching consensus about each one.
The aim of the session is to explore different viewpoints, gain deeper understanding of what makes a balanced peer review judgement and a good conference abstract, and to bring collaboration to the peer review process, which can be a daunting task for new reviewers.
All welcome, engagement with the three abstracts before the event is vital (approx. 30 mins pre-reading/review) as we will not have reading time during the event.
Chaired by members of the Conference and Events Committee.
Draft Programme:
16:00±è³¾ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýIntroduction; Tracy Ann Hayes, Sakina Jafri
16:05pm      Process for Reviewing Abstracts;Tracy Ann Hayes, Sakina Jafri
16:20pm      Discuss Example Abstract 1
16:50pm      Discuss Example Abstract 2
17:20pm      Discuss Example Abstract 3
17:50pm      Closing Thoughts
18:00pm      Event Close