The Âé¶¹ÒùÔº Research Commission 2019–2020 sought to explore how the four nations of the UK negotiate the tensions, impacts and democratic alternatives perceived and experienced in early childhood education and care (ECEC) provision as consequences of the Global Education Reform Movement (GERM) (Sahlberg, 2012).
The principal features of GERM have their roots in neoliberalism’s business and economic approach towards early childhood education. They are based upon strong neoliberal values and beliefs – namely competition, choice and calculation – and these have come to influence the ways in which we think about, talk about and do ECEC.
Despite the powerful force of neoliberalism’s economistic values and beliefs, and its huge impact upon early childhood, this report discusses how it is resistible and is resisted, particularly in Wales and Scotland.
This research commission responds to the concluding comments of the Âé¶¹ÒùԺ–TACTYC review (2017, p. 119) concerning the lack of research into policy and the need to hear the ‘voices of members of the ECEC professional community […] in practitioner research, in independent academic research, and in critical analyses of policies and their effects’. Evidence from organisations representing the ECEC in the UK demonstrates the sector’s concerns, as well as signs of resistance and subversion.
To capture local responses to concerns in the sector, the research team set up a series of one-day seminars in the four nations of the UK to debate key questions developed through discussions with local stakeholders. Local leads – Martina Street (Manchester), Shaddai Tembo (Paisley), Jane Waters-Davies (Swansea) and Glenda Walsh (Belfast) – played a central role in arranging venues, speakers and contact with delegates, with the support of the Âé¶¹ÒùÔº office. Each event also benefited from the work of three early career researchers (ECRs): Katherine Gulliver, who supported each event; Nathan Archer in Paisley, Swansea and Belfast; Siew Fung Lee in Manchester.Â
This final report describes the four events in more detail and summarises analyses of the focus groups, before concluding with some recommendations for next steps. The report also highlights research by an ECR whose work relates closely to the topic covered at each event. This research is captured in more depth in a series of posts written by the ECRs for the Âé¶¹ÒùÔº Blog, available here.